알파고 대 커제 2017-5-23 - utube 재방

알파고가 커제를 꺾었다.

 

알파고에 관심이 많다.   왠만하면 바둑채널에서 중계할 것 같은데 아무 소식도 없다. 

 

나중에라도 기보 해설이라도 할 것도 같은데 그것도 없다.

 

오늘 구글링을 해 보니 중국에서 생방송을 금지했다는 것이다.

 

중국 문화의 하나인 바둑(중국에서 발명한 세계적인 게임인 "바둑")이 단지 미국회사의 소프트웨어 문제에 불과하다는 것을 보여 주기 싫었다는 후문이다.   거기에다 구글은 중국에서 추방된 회사인데 구글의 자회사인 Deep Mind를 중국에서 선전하게 한다는 것도 불편해 했을 거란 이야기다.    개방된 우리에겐 낯선 이야기다.    https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/23/business/google-deepmind-alphago-go-champion-defeat.html

 

다행히 아래에 Utube 가 있다.   서울에서도 해설했던 Redmond 9단의 해설이다. 포맷이 똑 같으니 Deep Mind 의 공식 Utube 인 것 같다.

 

 

 

 

알파고 대 커 제 1 국

 

Still, China showed some skittishness at game time. Despite huge interest, many Chinese became consternated when it became apparent there was no obvious live video of the event online. A site that follows Chinese censorship orders, China Digital Times, posted a translated notice from the government calling for all websites to block the broadcast.

Advertisement

Continue reading the main story

“Anything that demonstrates that something special about China has turned out to be just another artificial intelligence problem that Google is better solving than any other company is additionally problematic,” said Clay Shirky, a professor at New York University Shanghai, “because it threatens the specialness of the culture.”

 

 

작년에 썼던 알파고에 대한 이야기를 다시 보고 싶은 분은 " 알파고의 태풍이 지나간 뒤 " 를 클릭 해 보세요.

Regarding the go match between Ke Jie and AlphaGo, no website, without exception, may carry a live stream. If one has been announced in advance, please immediately withdraw it. Please convey the gist of this to sports channels.

Again, we stress: this match may not be broadcast live in any form and without exception, including text commentary, photography, video streams, self-media accounts and so on. No website (including sports and technology channels) or desktop or mobile apps may issue news alerts or push notifications about the course or result of the match. (May 22) [Chinese]

uthorities that their organizations are not allowed to live broadcast the May 23-27 event. One of them said that his publication has been asked not to even mention Google’s name in reporting on the event. Another said that they are allowed to mention Google, but are not allowed to write about Google’s products in related news reports.